By Robert Lockard

Imagine trying to beat Microsoft at its own game. Microsoft, the giant of software and Web browsers, seemed all but unstoppable in its dominance of the Internet with its Internet Explorer browser five years ago. However, a small browser, which was originally called Phoenix, debuted on November 9, 2004 and started giving Explorer a run for its money.

We now know this Web browser as Firefox. And it recently turned five years old. Happy birthday, Firefox!

I read about Firefox’s anniversary in the Webware article, “After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges.” I talked a little about Firefox in my Submit Solution blog entry, “Google Chrome is the best Web browser.” I mentioned that it’s my favorite browser, even if it’s not exactly as fast as Chrome.

Many factors led up to the swift success of the Firefox browser. Microsoft got a little lazy on creating new features for Explorer. Plus, viruses were specifically designed to target Explorer, giving Internet users a strong incentive to try something new. Right on cue, Firefox arrived with its innovative tabbed interface, customizability and popup ad blocker. It was an instant hit, receiving 10 million downloads in the first month alone.

Firefox 2.0 was an even bigger success, gaining support from Web designers who started to comply with the new browser’s design standards. Google also lent a hand by embedding its search engine into the Firefox browser and giving Firefox a portion of the advertising revenue it received from searches through Firefox.

Google has now entered the fray with its own browser, Chrome. Who knows if it will be able to enjoy the same success as Firefox, but it’s a healthy thing to have competition, as Microsoft has certainly learned by now. Firefox is still going strong, though. It estimated about 160 million people downloaded the Firefox 3.0 version and more than 300 million have downloaded its current 3.5 version so far. For a five-year-old, Firefox is looking exceptionally strong.

Keep coming back to the Submit Solution Web Design Blog for great discussions on topics like this.

This is a complete version of the eHarbor Blog post: “Happy birthday, Firefox.” The photo of the Firefox birthday cake is from Flickr, and it is the copyright of Christopher Blizzard.

By the way, try saying the title of this blog entry three times fast. I’m no good at quickly repeating f sounds.

By Robert Lockard

That’s right. Google Chrome is the best Web browser by far, according to a study by Jacob Gube, the founder and chief editor of Six Revisions. Chrome v. 3 beat Firefox v. 3.5, Safari v. 4, Opera v.10 and Microsoft Explorer v. 8. Take a look at the results below.

You should definitely check out the whole chart by clicking on this link to the blog entry, “Performance Comparison of Major Web Browsers.” Fascinating stuff. I’ll discuss some of the highlights and their impact on ecommerce and Internet marketing.

I’m a Firefox user, myself, so some of this study’s results came as a surprise to me. I’m not sure if they will change my mind about which browser I use right now, but it’s definitely helped me think more about why I prefer one over the others. Here are some of the highlights of the study’s findings:

JavaScript Speed

Chrome won this competition with an average download time of JavaScripts in just 542.3 milliseconds. Safari was No. 2 with 863.9 milliseconds and Firefox was No. 3 with 1,230.6 milliseconds. Explorer was last with a comparatively long download time of 6,305.5 milliseconds.

JavaScripts are important because they are heavily used on websites like Digg, as well as in Gmail. It’s no surprise Google is the leader in this category because it definitely wants people to be able to quickly use its own applications.

Page Load Time

This study measured how long it takes each Web browser to download Yahoo’s main page. The trouble with these results is that they might be affected by how many other people were using the site at the time the study was conducted. Bearing that in mind, it’s interesting to see how close all of the Web browsers are to each other.

Firefox was the fastest with a download time of 1.34 seconds. The slowest time was 1.61 seconds and it was shared by Explorer and Safari. The difference between those two times is so small that it hardly matters which browser you use to download a website like Yahoo.

Browser Cache Performance

The same is true for both Page Load Times and Browser Cache Performance. Browsers often save a cached version of a Web page you have already visited so it can quickly bring it up again when you return to it. The download times of a cached page ranged from 0.72 seconds to 0.89 seconds, which statisticians would say is probably not a “significant” difference. Chrome had the fastest speed, while Safari had the slowest.

Other categories in the study had a wider variety of results, but I thought these ones were the most interesting.

This is all fascinating information, but what does it all mean? Why are fast download times important? If online users have to wait several seconds for one of your Web pages to download, they might just give up after a while and decide your site isn’t worth the wait.

We want our ecommerce websites to be fast enough for people, no matter which browser they use. But we should definitely focus on the most popular ones. That’s the subject of a whole other blog entry, though.

Keep coming back to the Submit Solution Website Design Services Blog for great discussions on topics like this.

This is a complete version of the eHarbor Blog post: “Which Web browser is the best?” The graph of the results of this study is the copyright of Jacob Gube and Six Revisions.

By Alyssa Udall (@udallyss)

Peer pressure, bullies, nicknames, cafeteria food… these are some of the things I recall when thinking of the American high school experience.  Is it possible that this dynamic we experienced in adolescence has permeated our new online socializing method, social media?!

Think about it: every social network has a method for gauging popularity or success (Friends, Followers, Karma, etc).  It is plausible that those who have few friends or followers would feel less important than those who have these lackeys in abundance.  Another example of this is peer pressure.  How many people have “persuaded” their friends or family members to join Facebook or Twitter because “everyone is doing it”?

Here are a couple prominent examples of classic bullying and peer pressure in the media:

PEER PRESSURE:  Facebook’s Reconnect Strategy

Facebook is looking to get less active users to “reconnect” and become more active.  Seems like a pretty good idea for a site won’t be growing utah social media marketing like crazy forever, and will soon need to focus on keeping their existing accounts.  How are they trying to reconnect people?  By posting a picture of one of your less active Facebook friends under the “suggestions” box with a caption that says: “Help make Facebook better for ____.  Write on his/her wall!”

Hmm… so Facebook’s strategy is to get people’s friends to pressure them back into Facebook activity?  From a business view, this is great.  From a personal view, I don’t like this very much.

BULLYING:  Apple vs. Microsoft Ads and Controversy

Sure, we’ve all had a laugh at Apple’s smooth commercials with the bumbling, outdated PC guy.  However, does Apple know where the line is and how close they are to crossing it?

One of the “Laptop Hunter” ads that Microsoft ran to combat Apple’s commercials features a girl saying, “maybe I’m just not cool enough,” when looking at the selection of Mac computers.  This suggests that Apple’s exclusivity and smooth advertising have created a persona of arrogance around its product image.  Apple’s ads directly targeting the incompetence of Microsoft’s new Windows 7, therefore, can be seen as merciless bullying.  Especially since Windows 7 is being received very well.

In discovering these connections in utah social media, it appears that wherever people are, there will be bullying, peer pressure and other behaviors typical in high school students.  Are these social issues inescapable?  Will they infiltrate every aspect of our existence?  Probably not.  It’s just interesting to notice these similarities.

By Robert Lockard

Have you heard? Google and Bing are adding new social-media search capabilities to their search engines in an attempt to keep up with these innovative websites. Bing already has a beta version of its new search engine designed specifically for Twitter results while Google is holding back at the moment.

Google and Microsoft are caught in an escalating fight over who will dominate the search-engine market for social-media sites like Twitter and Facebook. I read about this in the PC World article, “Real-Time Search: Google and Bing Rivalry Intensifies on Facebook and Twitter.” This article refers to the Google-Bing rivalry as a chess match. Quite an apt metaphor, in my opinion, because I love all of the strategy that goes into a seemingly simple chess game.

Social media has been a thorn in the side of major search engines for a few years now. Facebook and Twitter are simply updated too often and too fast for search engines to keep up with them. It looks like that might be changing, though.

Microsoft has already made deals with both Twitter and Facebook to give Bing access to the sites’ tweets and wall posts, respectively. Bing’s solution for Twitter is to have a tag cloud of the most-discussed topics on tech news, Twitter, followed by some of the newest tweets and links to sites being referred to frequently. For Facebook, Bing will include status updates in its search-engine results pages.

Google is taking it a bit more slowly. It could be several months before it starts earnestly including tweets in its search results. Its new Social Search service, which is also not yet launched, will provide an interesting twist on tech news indexing Facebook updates. With this service, Google users will only be able to search for updates related to topics that their friends and fans have added on Facebook. That’s pretty cool!

Facebook users can choose whether or not to allow their updates to be included in search engines like Google or Bing. That should help protect people’s privacy. What do you think of these search engines’ attempts to dive into social media? Keep coming back to the Submit Solution SEO Blog for the latest updates on Google and Bing, as well as other major search-engine trends.

This is a complete version of the eHarbor Blog entry, “Bing and Google launch social-media solutions.” The photo of the chess match is from Flickr, and it is the copyright of marcusrg.

By Robert Lockard

The other day, I had an image in my mind of a strange object and I wanted to find a picture of it online. The only problem was I didn’t have a clue what it was called. The image in my head was of a scene in “Superman II” when General Zod’s henchman Non is in the Oval Office and he’s staring intently at something. It’s five metal balls tied to strings in a row and the ones on either end keep hitting the four still balls, causing the ball on the other end to bounce away and come back again.

Maybe you already know what I’m talking about.

I turned to one of my coworkers here at eHarbor, Inc. and asked her to help me. She could picture it, as well, but she couldn’t put her finger on the name. I tried searching for “metal ball attached to strings hitting each other” on Google, but I didn’t find what I was looking for. Luckily, my resourceful coworker found it on Amazon.com, I believe. I could now put a name to an image – Newton’s cradle!

This story illustrates my need for a visual search engine and not simply a text-based one. Luckily, Microsoft and Google are both heading in that direction. I read about their efforts in a CNN article entitled, “Microsoft, Google expand search-engine tools.”

None of the Bing Visual Search galleries look like they would help me find Newton’s cradle because they mostly include people, entertainment and electronics. But it’s new, so I’m willing to cut Microsoft some slack. I’m sure they will get better as they get a feel for what people are (literally) looking for.

Microsoft is still trying hard to break Google’s domination of the search-engine market. The CNN article cited a comScore study showing that, in June, about 65 percent of online searches were done through Google, while just 8.4 percent were done through Bing.

I’ve talked about the race between Microsoft and Google to develop a stronghold over a variety of online and software industries before. You can read about it in my blog entry, “Google-Microsoft face-off good for ecommerce.” Their rivalry is bringing great innovations like these visual search engines. I’ll hopefully talk more about Google’s Fast Flip in a forthcoming blog entry. For now, I’ll say adieu.

This is a complete version of the eHarbor Blog entry, “Finding Superman image on Google no easy feat.” The photo of Newton’s cradle is from Flickr, and it is the copyright of ƒяαиcєscα яσsє.

Photo credit: www.inmagine.com

By Britnee Nguyen

Microsoft released Bing (formerly known as MSN Search) just a few months ago with more than $80 million being spent in promoting it. An issue that has been brought up was whether the SEO rankings of companies would be affected. If Bing becomes more increasingly popular, then companies will need to start catering their utah SEO techniques to it or else they’ll lose out on searches being made there.

Bing is still fairly new so many are waiting to see its long-term effects. Right now, some are saying it’s a good idea for companies to make the extra effort within the next year to increase ranking to take advantage of Bing’s advertising push for utah online marketing. Since Bing is paying so much money right now promoting itself, its bound to have a lot of traffic flowing through at this time.

Companies could take advantage of this new venture by jumping on to get more higher rankings on Bing. Google is still the number one search engine and will most likely always popular, but Bing is working hard to become a household name. They recently just partnered with Yahoo’s utah search engine marketing and will be working together.

Although Microsoft’s efforts are admirable, I’m not sure if Bing will hold out for as long as Google has. Google has made such a statement that they’ve become a verb such as, “Google it.” They have such a strong presence that I even went to Google to search “What is Bing?” and look for news and blog posts about it. It was only after that I decided to go to bing.com itself.

That’s just my own personal experience, but I’m sure there have been others who have become hooked on it since it’s the new thing. Even though I don’t think Bing will be as strong as Google, I still think it’s a good idea for companies to get involved with it during this popularity burst. And if Bing does end up being a top search engine, then companies will benefit more receiving traffic from more than just Google.

By Alyssa Udall (@udallyss)

September 8th, 2009

It’s finally here! Microsoft and Yahoo have reached a new deal which will allow Bing to power all Yahoo searches, while Yahoo focuses on producing content and other products. Now that Microsoft and Yahoo have finally reached a merger agreement, it would be helpful to explore the changes this partnership will make on SEO and Pay-Per-Click advertising.

With the new deal in place, Yahoo search will now be powered by Microsoft’s new Bing search technology. This situation changes the game for PPC in a few ways.

Here are some aspects of paid search you can expect to see change:

Even out the market share. For years, Google has accounted for over sixty percent of all search-engine queries. Now that one of Google’s competitors, Yahoo, has been eliminated, Bing has the opportunity to finally be competitive with them. While most PPC ads will be focused toward Google for the next few years, Bing has the chance to gain many new clients in the future.

Double the fun. For loyal Yahoo users who will continue to use their search engine, Bing will receive double the traffic. PPC ads in Bing will also be highly successful, as their content will now be displayed in the results for two prominent search engines. To sweeten the deal, these ads will also be shown in relative MSN content, boosting the overall exposure of all Bing’s PPC clients. However, the conglomerate Google will still rule this field for awhile to come.

Let the games begin. As Bing continues to grow, bids for PPC ads will become increasingly competitive. As Bing tends to have less strict regulations than Google on quality scores and other measures, utah online marketing it can be expected that PPC on Bing will definitely see a boom at the beginning of the merger deal. However, as Bing becomes more competitive with Google, they will most likely raise these regulations to become more like their rival and increase the quality of their results.

As we advance further into this development, it will be interesting to see how Bing grows and how Google reacts to the competition. As history has frequently shown us, competition tends to breed better products, services and customer satisfaction. There should be no exception with this search-engine duel!

By Robert Lockard

It looks like two Davids are joining forces to take on Goliath. After years of public wrangling over the details, Microsoft and Yahoo finally announced a proposed 10-year partnership between their search-engine and online-advertising departments on Wednesday, July 29, 2009.

“In simple terms, Microsoft will now power Yahoo search while Yahoo will become the exclusive worldwide relationship sales force for both companies’ premium search advertisers,” the official Microsoft news release said.

The way I read that sentence, it means they will pool their resources so that Yahoo’s search engine will have the same tools as the Bing “decision engine.” It also means Bing will have access to Yahoo’s superior online advertising services and it can give advertisers better results and a bigger audience.

Right now, Google controls about 70 percent of the online-search market, while Microsoft and Yahoo, combined, only account for nearly 30 percent of all Internet searches. They’ll need a lot more stones in their sling if they hope to take down the giant.

What does this new relationship mean for pay-per-click advertisers? According to the news release,

Yahoo will become the exclusive worldwide relationship sales force for both companies’ premium search advertisers. Self-serve advertising for both companies will be fulfilled by Microsoft’s AdCenter platform, and prices for all search ads will continue to be set by AdCenter’s automated auction process.

Advertisers will be able to take advantage of Microsoft’s online-advertising tools while also receiving Yahoo’s expert service. This new service will hopefully offer the best of both worlds.

“Through this agreement with Yahoo, we will create more innovation in search, better value for advertisers and real consumer choice in a market currently dominated by a single company,” Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said, referring to Google.

Of course, companies and their CEOs want to promote their services as much as possible. Google probably has a completely different take on these events. So what are your thoughts? Is this development good or bad for ecommerce and Internet marketing? This is a complete version of the blog post on the eHarbor Blog: “What the Microsoft-Yahoo merger means for ecommerce.”

The Microsoft-Yahoo logo is from Flickr, and it is the copyright of JVManna.

By Robert Lockard

The Bing decision engine is the most-visible sign of competition between Microsoft and Google, but the two technology giants are competing in many ways besides their search engines. And online companies and users are benefiting from their rivalry.

According to a Wired magazine article, “Google vs. Microsoft: What you need to know,” there are several ways Microsoft and Google are trying take market share from each other. I’ll discuss how some of those ways could be good for us who work in ecommerce and Internet marketing.

For instance, Google’s online advertising services, through Adsense, have taken pay-per-click campaigns to a new level. This service allows many websites to post paid-search ads from Google and earn money when someone clicks on one of them. This allows these sites to translate visitors into revenue, and it also helps Google earn money on its advertising campaigns. Web marketers benefit from the added exposure, allowing them to reach more online users than ever before.

Microsoft is trying to get into this market with Bing cashback. It has yet to become profitable, like Google, in the arena of online advertising, but the additional competition could mean lower advertising rates and better service for Internet marketers. I discussed Bing at length in an eHarbor Blog entry, “Bing decision engine good for online marketing.”

Although Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser has already had plenty of competition from Mozilla Firefox, Google’s new Chrome browser is sure to push them to innovate even more.

By the way, as I read this article, I noticed a glaring grammatical error that called out for me to comment on. Here’s the sentence:

It is, however, not a death match — it’s more of an fight to see who will be the King of Technology…

So close. By the way, this is a complete version of the blog entry on the eHarbor Blog: “Google-Microsoft face-off benefits ecommerce.” The Google vs. Microsoft photo is from Flickr, and it is courtesy of michperu.